This website uses cookies to enhance your experience and for marketing. By continuing to browse, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn more in our Privacy Policy. arrow icon

close X icon
chevron-icon

The 2026 State of Spend: Navigating the New Normal of Value-Centric Shopping

After years of sustained economic volatility, the consumer packaged goods (CPG) industry stands at a clear inflection point. To thrive in this environment, CPG brands must move beyond traditional loyalty models and adopt a new playbook focused on delivering consistent and compelling value to today’s shoppers.

In our third annual report, we surveyed more than 5,000 U.S. grocery shoppers with a goal of shedding light on the current and future state of consumer spend in 2026. Our findings reveal evolving consumer spending behaviors that require CPG marketers to be more thoughtful and dynamic in their strategies than ever before.

The rise of the insulated consumer

No longer in "crisis mode," the American shopper has entered a new normal, one where flexible routines and pragmatic, value-centric behaviors have better insulated them from the day-to-day anxieties of inflation. 

In previous years, consumer perceptions of the economy and its impact on their personal finances have gone hand in hand, a symptom of rising prices and diminishing buying power in the grocery aisle. But this year we’re seeing a shift, and it’s having a notable effect on how and where consumers shop.

Shifting economic perceptions

Shifting economic perceptions

Despite an increase in economic pessimism, fewer consumers reported feeling the effects of economic conditions on their household finances, spending habits, and need to save on groceries. These numbers suggest that behavioral adaptations — like switching stores or brands and seeking out deals — have become increasingly routine. By establishing these new habits, consumers have shielded themselves from economic headwinds and, as a result, feel more in control of their personal budgets. 

This isn’t to say that grocery costs aren’t still a concern — 67% of consumers surveyed still acknowledge the negative impact of inflation on their household finances. Rather, it provides important context for the spending habits we’ll explore throughout this report. 

This defensive playbook manifests in two key ways: a shift toward value-focused retailers like Walmart and Dollar General and a growing de-prioritization of brand names.

This price-first mindset has driven a continued increase in private label purchases, as the perception of quality closes the gap with national brands. It has also led to less reliance on pre-planned grocery lists, giving way to a flexible, opportunistic shopper who leverages in-store sales and promotions as a strategic trade-off. 

For CPGs, the message is clear: the battle for the cart is fiercer than ever. With 74% of the cart anchored by habitual purchases, successful trial — often requiring a discount of 25% or more in key categories like food — is the essential cost of driving meaningful shifts in sales. Furthermore, digital promotions have become a foundational value layer, with 56% of shoppers now expecting brands to offer digital coupons and cash back as a standard part of the shopping experience. 

As we dive deeper into these trends, we’ll give brands their own playbook for navigating this new normal with confidence.

Reimagining the grocery list: From rigid plans to flexible opportunism

Reimagining the gorcery list

Which of the following best describes how you typically plan for your grocery shopping trips when you are shopping in-store?

So what does this new normal look like in action? It starts before a shopper even enters the store — or it used to.

The pre-trip grocery list has long been a ritual for the vast majority of shoppers. However, its importance is waning. While 68% of consumers still make some sort of list before hitting the grocery store, that number is down from 75% in 2023. This shift is not a sign of indifference but rather a strategic evolution that allows consumers to be more nimble and value-centric in their purchase decisions.

Nearly one-third (32%) of shoppers now enter the store with only a loose idea or no plan at all (up from 25% in 2023). This flexibility is a calculated trade-off. It allows consumers to deviate from a specific brand or product list to capitalize on immediate value opportunities.

This proves out when we look at the most common ways consumers are saving on groceries right now. In-store sales saw the biggest year-over-year increase in use as a savings method, up to 60% from 55% the year prior. Once again though, digital coupons and cash back remain the most commonly used savings tactics, utilized by 64% of shoppers.

Saving Tactics Starburst Graph            

Savings tactics in past month: Which of the following ways have you used to save on groceries in the past month?

            
Retailers donut charts

Which of the following stores/companies have you purchased groceries from in the past 30 days (either in-store or online)?

The decline in list-making has created space for a more dynamic, flexible approach to the shopping trip — and it requires a more dynamic approach from brands too. Investing in tactics that can reach consumers at both the planning stage and in the grocery aisle will be critical for brands looking to drive meaningful growth in 2026.

This flexible shopping behavior also shows up in where consumers shop. As part of this “new normal” they’ve established new routines at retailers whose value propositions revolve around savings. This includes retailers like Walmart, Dollar General, and Club stores, which saw the most growth among shoppers in 2025. 

To meet consumers where they shop in 2026, brands need a robust omni-channel marketing strategy that accounts for these shifts.

The battle for the 26%: Breaking into the habitual cart

Battle for the 26 percent

The composition of the average shopper’s cart has remained stable for three years now, cementing a rule of habit that defines the loyalty landscape. The consumer cart is anchored by a stable 74% of items which they’ve previously purchased, representing a solidified lineup of trusted, value-driven choices — and making the strategic acquisition of new customers a key challenge for CPG brands.

This leaves a critical gap: only 26% of the cart is made up of first-time purchases. This small, volatile segment is the entire battleground for customer acquisition and growth. The challenge for brands is further highlighted by the fact that 76% of shoppers surveyed agree that once they find a brand they like, they stick to it.

However, this represents an opportunity for brands too, as a successful trial could quickly move a product into the secure 74% of a shopper’s cart. For brands, this makes driving trial an essential strategy for acquiring market share in this price-conscious environment.

When a new food brand becomes part of a shopper's new normal

point of consideration for new food brand            

You end up buying a different [insert vertical] brand from what you usually buy and like it. Which statement best describes when you would consider that new food brand to be your new normal (and stop buying the original preferred brand)?

            

Even a single successful trial can be enough to convert a shopper into a loyal customer. Across categories, most of the consumers we surveyed said that after they’ve bought and used a product once and liked it, they’d consider it part of their new normal and stop buying their old preferred brand. 

Unlocking growth: Price and value dynamics across key verticals

The battle for brand loyalty is not monolithic; it shifts from one category to the next. Understanding these vertical-specific dynamics — particularly the inherent friction of getting a consumer to switch brands — is critical for CPG brands looking to drive trial and acquire new customers. 

Across all categories, however, a few common drivers underpin every repeat purchase decision: consistent, reliable quality and performance is the top factor, followed closely by the best balance of quality and price.

Let’s drill down deeper.

Reducing switching friction

Switching friction — the level of resistance a consumer has to trying a new brand — varies significantly by category. Understanding this friction can help brands determine the level of incentive that will be most effective in disrupting established habits and converting a first-time buyer.

Incentivizing brand switching by category

Brand loyalty            

Imagine you are standing in the grocery aisle, reaching for a [insert vertical] brand you normally buy. Next to it, there is a different brand that has a cash back offer. What cash back offer is the minimum required to make you pause, put down your usual brand, and try the new one instead?

            

The rewards needed to move the needle in high-friction categories — particularly Food and Beverage — should be viewed as a strategic and worthwhile investment, not an insurmountable obstacle. By leveraging targeted promotions that can better tailor offers to shoppers’ unique loyalty thresholds, marketers can maximize their budgets and drive measurable outcomes for their brands. 

Navigating consumer price sensitivity

When faced with higher prices, consumers will generally take one of three paths: buy it anyway, trade down to a less expensive alternative, or opt out of the purchase entirely. What path they choose depends largely on what they’re shopping for and whether they consider that item an essential or discretionary purchase. 

Necessities

Necessity

Discretionary purchases

Nice to have

Necessity & Nice to have KEY

The data confirms that for both Beverage and Health & Beauty consumers are most likely to buy anyways when it comes to necessities, making these segments less susceptible to trading down. Conversely, in the Food and Home categories, shoppers are nearly split between trading down and buying anyways, highlighting the significant role value plays in their decision-making process for essential items.

When considering discretionary purchases, a consumer’s willingness to trade down or abandon the purchase altogether increases significantly. The Home category sees the highest rate of trading down for non-essentials at 50%, closely followed by Food at 47%. Furthermore, Food sees the highest rate of completely opting out, with 18% of shoppers surveyed choosing not to make the discretionary purchase at all. For Beverage and Health & Beauty, while trading down remains the most common response, a strong portion of shoppers will still choose to buy the product anyways (41% and 39%, respectively). This indicates that even for discretionary items, their brand or product commitment remains a powerful factor.

The shift toward private label: How store brands are closing the quality gap

Shift toward private label

Compared to this time last year, would you say you are buying store brand/private label items more or less often?

The price-first mindset of today’s consumer has driven a significant and accelerating shift toward private label products in recent years, and our latest survey revealed even greater adoption in 2025. This surge is fueled not just by the need to save money but by a fading consumer belief in the superior quality of national brands.

Private label purchasing has become a staple of the new consumer routine, with clear data pointing toward its continued growth. Of the consumers we surveyed, 44% report buying more store brand and private label products than they did last year. And this trend is expected to hold strong.

In 2026, 88% of shoppers surveyed plan to either increase or maintain their current levels of private label purchasing — 35% of which specifically stated they plan to increase. This widespread adoption is underpinned by the overall value-centric environment, where 62% of shoppers now value price above brand name in their purchasing decisions.

Name brand vs store brand

For each of the following statements, please select how much you agree or disagree when it comes to what you buy from the grocery store. [somewhat agree, strongly agree]

Understanding growing private label adoption

Critically, the gap between the perceived quality of name brands and private label is closing rapidly. The belief that name brands offer better quality dropped from 44% to 38% over the last year. This decline indicates that private label products are increasingly meeting the core consumer demand for consistent, reliable quality and performance, thus removing a key historical barrier to adoption.

To win back these private label switchers, brands need to focus on price and quality above all else. A notable 48% of shoppers surveyed say they want the price difference between a national brand and private label to disappear in order to consider switching back to a brand name. Additionally, 20% say they’re looking for name brands to improve their quality or ingredients. This may seem easier said than done, but it’s a critical consideration for brands looking to stay competitive in 2026.

Trust parity across categories

Consumers who trust the quality of private labels as much as name brands

Trust parity across categories            

I trust the quality of store/private label food products as much as name-brand food products. [somewhat agree, strongly agree]

            

The level of trust in private label quality is high across most major categories, though not universal. 62% of shoppers surveyed trust the quality of store brand foods as much as name brands, a parity that suggests a strong foothold for private labels in everyday consumables. The Home category shows similar confidence, with 60% of shoppers surveyed trusting private label quality for household items, demonstrating a high level of faith in store-brand options for products that prioritize guaranteed performance. Trust parity is lower in the Beverage and Health & Beauty verticals, at 55% and 56% respectively. While this still represents a majority of consumers, it does signal that there may be greater stickiness for familiar name brands in these categories, likely due to a higher commitment to taste and routine.

The evolving role of promotions: From loyalty to value layer

The role of discounts and promotions has undergone a fundamental transformation, shifting from a once-powerful loyalty-building mechanism to a now-expected — and critical — layer of transactional value. This affects how promotions shape a consumer’s relationship with a brand — and ultimately, how marketers can best leverage them to drive results.

The evolving role of promotions            

Q31 - Purchase inspiration: In the past month, did any of the following encourage you to purchase a new or unfamiliar brand at the grocery store?

            

When it comes to actually converting a shopper, discounts and promotions have the most powerful influence. They are the mechanism most likely to move a shopper past initial introduction and toward trial and purchase. This is clearly demonstrated by the fact that 68% of consumers who learned about a new product because of a discount or promotion went on to buy that product. The promotion, therefore, acts as a critical conversion lever, directly translating awareness into a successful first purchase.

Consumers who agree cash back justifies premium purchases

Category justification            

Finding a cash back offer makes me feel justified in buying a more premium [insert vertical] item

            

Promotions also serve as a key lever for value-added purchasing. Over 50% of shoppers across the Food, Beverage, and Home categories feel justified in purchasing premium items if they find a cash back offer. This "Justifier Effect” allows brands to use targeted rewards to unlock higher-value transactions in an environment where consumers remain highly price-conscious.

Justifier effect bar graph            

How much do you agree or disagree with the following when it comes to cash back offers?

            

Consumers’ perceptions of rewards remain positive, with the number of consumers who said they feel valued by rewards increasing from 71% to 75% year over year. However, the data also shows a measurable decline in brand recommendations resulting from these offers. Today, 55% of consumers say they’re likely to recommend a brand to others because of a cash back offer, down from 61% the year prior. This suggests that while rewards continue to be an effective way to generate goodwill amongst consumers, their role in turning shoppers into brand advocates is softening.

Promotions — particularly digital ones — play an especially critical role in consumers’ savings routines. Of the people we surveyed, 64% said they’d used digital coupons or cash back to save on groceries in the last month. This outranked all other savings tactics, including in-store sales and buying store brand or generic products.

In fact, promotions have become so ingrained in shoppers’ routines that 56% of shoppers surveyed now expect brands to offer them. This underscores one key takeaway: Promotions are no longer a nice to have but rather a fundamental part of any successful marketing strategy.

This evolving dynamic necessitates a strategic shift in how brands view and deploy their promotional spending. Rewards are more important than ever for influencing purchasing decisions and making a shopper feel appreciated for that purchase. However, one-off promotions are no longer sufficient for securing long-term, deep-seated brand loyalty in a shopping environment where the best overall value proposition wins.

2026 outlook: How consumer spending patterns will change

The insulated shopper has effectively stabilized their routine against economic pressures, but the consumer landscape remains dynamic. While the core behavioral trends we’ve identified — from price-first decision-making to promotions as an expected value layer — will persist, the market is poised for additional shifts in 2026. Consumers are not just reacting to the economy anymore; they are proactively making intentional decisions about where and how they plan to spend their money.

How consumers plan to spend in 2026

How consumers plan to spend in 2026            

2026 predictive spend: Looking ahead to 2026, how do you plan to adjust your spend on the following areas?

            

Based on shoppers’ spend predictions for this year, we expect to see an increase in spend across the Food (18% net increase) and Pet categories (12% net increase), with Baby products also seeing a notable increase (5% net increase) compared to other categories. Absent a continuous rise in purchase incidence, spending in all other categories is expected to remain relatively flat.

better for you graph_left

better for you graph_right

Better for you graph_KEY

One potential reason for the expected growth in the Food vertical is the rise of “better-for-you” products both on shelves and in shoppers’ carts. 52% of food shoppers surveyed plan to buy more "better-for-you" products in 2026, which is a jump from the 47% who are already actively seeking those options now — even if they come at a higher cost. Furthermore, this future growth is supported by an additional 18% of those not currently prioritizing better-for-you options who plan to do so this year. 

The beverage vertical shows a similar trajectory. 43% of consumers surveyed are actively looking for healthier options, and 46% of beverage buyers plan on increasing their purchases of these items in 2026.

This willingness to prioritize healthier options — even at a higher cost — presents a clear growth strategy for CPGs. Brands should invest in the premium, "better-for-you" segment, but crucially, they must pair it with a value lever. By deploying personalized promotions and cash back offers, marketers can leverage the "Justifier Effect" to bridge the price gap and unlock high-value transactions that secure a position in the consumers’ increasingly health-conscious routines.

Navigating the new normal in 2026

The 2026 consumer landscape will continue to be defined by the insulated shopper, who has successfully stabilized their routine against economic volatility by making price and perceived value the most important considerations in their purchasing decisions. This shift has cemented the challenge for CPG brands: the market-share battle is now confined to the small, highly competitive 26% of the cart made up of first-time purchases. To break in, brands must accept offering the kinds of compelling incentives that effectively drive trial.

Furthermore, promotions have evolved into an always-on strategic layer that’s critical for conversions, driving both value-driven and premium purchases. Moving forward, success for CPGs depends on a dual strategy: strategically investing in trial to break into the 26% and then building long-term loyalty — the kind that secures a spot in the habitual cart — based not on sentiment but on the most compelling, consistent value proposition.

For CPG brands navigating this new normal, the Ibotta Performance Network (IPN) offers the essential playbook for success. The IPN provides the insights and solutions brands need to overcome switching friction and cement their position in the modern consumer’s grocery cart.

Learn how the IPN can help your brand lead the market in 2026.

Contact us